Instead of owning up to their misdeeds, though, some Boy Scout leaders are blaming the evil gays and atheists for forcing these actions on the BSA. That's right, it's really all the fault of gays and atheists for bringing the public's attention to the ways in which the Boy Scouts promote bigotry and discrimination. This has evidently cost the BSA money from charities and government organizations, so they've had to make up the difference by destroying forests. Right, that makes sense.
While its Outdoor Code directs youths to “be conservation-minded,” the organization that uses land as a lure to instill such values in boys has often sought cash exclusively from developers, not land trusts or conservation groups, when seeking to sell property, a Hearst review of national sales found. ...
Boy Scout councils are independent. Yet the organization’s central governing body, based in Texas, has strongly emphasized financial performance in the last decade — often, critics claim, rewarding leaders who presided over controversial land and timber deals on behalf of councils that were already well-off. ...
Critics argue that some sales and timber harvests often seem haphazard or opportunistic. Forestland “will be in the hands of the Boy Scouts for a long time and then, ‘Oh gee, we can make a lot more money if we sell it and develop it,’ ” said Brian Boyle, leader of the Northwest Environmental Forum and an opponent of sales of timberlands. ...
The Beaumont-based council, for example, generated ill will after it merged with the Orange-based council and then sold Camp Bill Stark, land donated decades before by an Orange-based foundation for youth use. The land was immediately clear-cut by new owners.
Source: Houston Chronicle
It's possible to do some development and logging in responsible ways. Sometimes it's necessary to do some clearing in forests in order to prevent fires, for example. In such cases, the Boy Scouts could have taught proper land management, conservation, and made money all at the same time. That didn't happen when the Boy Scouts engaged in "haphazard or opportunistic" profit-taking.
It's important to note that this has been going on since at least 1990, which is almost a twenty year span of time. This isn't a new or recent development in response to recent lawsuits.
"In public, they say they want to teach kids about saving the environment," said Jane Childers, a longtime scouting volunteer in Washington state who has fought against scouts' logging. "But in reality, it's all about the money."
"The Boy Scouts had to suffer the consequences for sticking by their moral values," said Eugene Grant, president of the Portland, Ore., Cascade Pacific Council's board of directors. "There's no question" that the Scouts' anti-gay, anti-atheist stance has cost the organization money, he said. As a result, he said, "every council has looked at ways to generate funds ... and logging is one of them."
Source: San Francisco Chronicle (via: Bligbi)
By "sticking by their moral values," Eugene Grant actually refers to the Boy Scouts sticking to the "moral values" of bigotry, discrimination, and hate. Frankly, I think that any group which insists on "sticking" to such "values" should lose money — they shouldn't receive any support whatsoever from public foundations, government or charities. Any organization or person who contributes to a bigoted organization like the Boy Scouts is directly and deliberately complicit in that bigotry. Anyone who supports the Boy Scouts of America is supporting bigotry, discrimination, and hatred.... and now, also the destruction of America's natural resources.



“Support the Boy Scouts of America.
For bigotry, discrimination, hatred and the destruction of America’s natural resources.”
…its catchy
Soooo, in order to “stick by their moral values” (against atheists and gays),they had to not stick by their moral values (to provide bequeathed land for use to teach kids about nature).
Makes a lot of sense.
They should have deforested the trees to spell out a statement about the evils of atheists and gays for passing planes!
The boy scouts have shown themselves to be morally bankrupt again.
I have no problem with logging. The trees will grow back and the added habitat diversity can be a valuable teaching tool. Pawning off land donated for the benefit of the scouts is reprehensible.
I have to admit that such practice really makes me wonder about the way scouting gets changed over time by people who do not understand what scouting means nor what it stands for.
It is because of people like this that some scouting organizations over the world ask that their members be of a certain religion, of a certain sexual orientation, of a certain nationality, of a certain gender…
At the very beginning, Scouting was about showing youth to behave with honor, to help others, to be considerate of their environment and to take responsabilities for their actions.
What about now? So many scouting organizations have abandonned the original mission of scouting, trading the Scout Law and their values for money and membership. You know, scouting was never intended to discriminate anyone on religion or sexual orientation. The reason that BSA does it is because the people in position of power in this organisation have decided it.
I believe that in its essence scouting is still a good thing, but I also believe that many people in the world pretend to be scout while the only thing they do is act like prejudiced capitalists, not like moral individuals, not like true scouts.
A scout
When I was involved with scouting I was proud of the statement that scouts didn’t practice religious discrimination. Not any more tho.
Sixty years ago I was a “Sea Scout” I can’t recall ever having any religious connection. But then that was in Britain.
I also went to “All Saints” a Church of England school. I believe it produced a lot of irreverent pupils and certainly many atheists. As the Headmaster, more than once, would remark. “All Saints” Not the makings of a saint amongst the lot of you. Not wrong there.