Read Article: Webster v. New Lenox (1990)

So long as theists insist on claiming there are gods we should believe in, atheists will need the tools to evaluate these claims.
Atheists are frequently challenged to explain why they are so critical of religious and theistic beliefs. Why do we care what others believe? Why don't we just leave people alone to believe what they want?
Read Article: Webster v. New Lenox (1990)
This can be a helpful argument to be able to make given how often religious apologists — both theists and atheists — try to claim that theism shouldn't be criticized so harshly because even if it is false, it's harmless at best if not positively beneficial. It can be shown that this is a poor justification for false beliefs, but being able to counter it more directly as well is a good idea. Read more...
If you spend much time discussing religion, politics, and philosophy, you'll quickly find that if you want to get anywhere you'll need to acquire some skill when it comes to analyzing, understanding, and refuting basic arguments — and that's all before you learn how to properly construct your own. But just where do you go to get such skills?
Book of the Week: The Philosopher's Toolkit: A Compendium of Philosophical Concepts and Methods
©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.
All rights reserved.