After all, religious leaders proclaim the importance of all sorts of ideals which no one expects anyone to actually achieve on a regular basis. Humans are imperfect, so we do all sorts of things wrong — but it's our ideals and high standards which help us see what we did wrong and what we need to do to improve. Unfortunately, many of the standards promoted by religious leaders have more to do with faith than skepticism and obedience than critical thinking.
Contrary to what some might imagine, this has real-world implications for how people approach claims, ideas, and opinion outside of religion. The Grand Rapids Atheist writes:
People here at my work are devout Christians. And to make matters worse, they pretty much only make decisions based on what their pastor says. Here is a list of things that people here have purported to be true, and this is just lately;
1: All the women at a particular restaurant are prostitutes.
I asked how they knew this to be true and this was the response: “Because my friend told me so.” This person never ate at the restaurant in question, and doesn’t know anybody who works there.
2: Email forwards
These are my favorite, they all start out along the same lines as this “This explains things better than all the baloney you hear on TV.” And go on to explain how men hide in the backseat of your car, cut your Achilles tendon while hiding under your car, how you need to check your hotel beds for HIV infected needles, and any number of insane warnings that are not validated with facts. When I ask them about how they know them to be true, I usually get an answer like this; “My friend got it from a friend who is a (insert profession here, cop, marine, lawyer, etc…)”. Right.
3. Resistance to Art
It could be anything, music, movies, TV shows etc.. Example; I was speaking about how my son loves Spongebob Squarepants. The girl I was talking about the show with freaked out! “I cant believe you let him watch that! Its a bad show!” I asked her why it is a bad show and she said that “She heard it was”. She didn’t want to actually find out if it was a “bad show”, she just wanted to tell people it was. She was operating on a claim that was made without finding any evidence to prove or disprove it. I explained to her that she needs to watch the show before she makes a statement of fact like that. She said she didn't need to. OK.
As the author points out, there is a clear pattern here: people who have been raised to accept the word of religious leaders and scriptures on faith continue to accept other claims on faith. There is ultimately little difference between common religious claims heard in churches and the sorts of claims listed above — if anything, the claims above are far more plausible and believable than those typically taught in churches. For a person raised to believe in people rising from the dead, what's not to believe in the above?
What acceptance of the claims above demonstrates, though, is how harmful a lack of even rudimentary skepticism and critical thinking can be. We can't expect everyone to exercise the highest levels of critical thinking in all situations — perfect rationality isn't possible and may not even really be a good idea. We should, however, expect people to exercise at least a bit of skepticism, critical thinking, and logic when it comes to various claims that float around a community. It's not asking too much to expect reasonable adults to ask, when faced with claims like these, "what's the evidence?" Unfortunately, people raised to simply believe on faith don't always become reasonable adults.


It’s true some people try to force there religious garbage on others. The author of the Clergy Letter Project is just that sort of person. His blasphemies have discredited the sacred writings of the Prophet Charles Darwin and brought doubt to some of the believers. We here at the First Church of Evolution deplore such trash. And we believe the religion of the Darwinians should be set apart as the height of imagination and not equated to any other concept. http://www.fcefaith.org
Snary scarcasm. Totataly wrong idea of Darwin’s role in scientific thought.
Snarky scarcasm. Totataly wrong idea of Darwin’s role in scientific thought.
Abo’s comment is indicative of the “shoot from the hip” mentality that permeates Christianity. It works for them, among themselves that is, because belief is the ultimate determinant of truth. For the devout Christian belief has a supernatural power that reason just can’t match. One can’t argue one’s way into that cushy afterlife that matters so much to believers. Eternal bliss for oneself – Christianity’s ultimate concern – can only be acquired by fully embracing whatever version of doctrinal belief currently prevails. Those who do not believe are invalid and their ideas are valid. Anything not founded upon or generated from belief is by definition invalid. The need to secure personal eternal bliss in the afterlife motivates believers. If belief entails contradiction, falsehood and absurd logic is not relevvant to the believer. They are “worldly” considerations predicated upon the “wisdom of man,” not founded upon the “revealed truth of scripture.” Only the self-imposed ignorance resulting from reliance solely upon belief can confuse scientific theory with religion.
Mike S.,
I cannot begin to explain how much it saddens me that Abo would be unable to understand or accept such an accurate summation of religious unreason. I can say this with confidence because I remember what it was like to think the way Abo does. However, it has helped me to flesh out some of my own ideas about religious unreason, being a recently deconverted Christian. Much of what you’ve written here so concisely has taken me page after page just to get in the ballpark. Thank you.
NOT Spoungebob Squarepants! NOOOOOOooooo Now there isen’t anything to watch on TV! ha, ha Sure must be easy being a Christian..you don’t have to think at all.
Chuck