Amy Sullivan writes for The New Republic:
Bush is one of the most explicitly religious politicians in American history. Both of his presidential campaigns have used religion to appeal emotionally to voters. The entire philosophy behind his signature slogan, "compassionate conservatism," rests on the belief that religious communities have a unique ability to tend to the nation's social ills. And yet, after the flood of coverage around Bush's first--and only--visit to a neighborhood church during inauguration weekend in Washington, D.C., no one has bothered to report on the president's whereabouts on Sunday mornings.
Around Washington, D.C., it's considered bad form to point out that Bush doesn't regularly attend church. "You don't have to go to church to be a good religious person," argue his defenders. And they're right. They have made much political hay, however, over polls that indicate Democratic voters attend church less frequently than Republicans, so even the most brazen feel compelled to offer explanations for Bush's absence from church membership rolls.
The very fact that the president doesn't attend church, some leading conservatives insist, is proof of what a good Christian he is. Unlike certain past presidents they could name but won't--ahem, cough, Bill Clinton--Bush doesn't feel the need to prove his religiosity. "This president has not made an issue of where he goes to church," says Michael Cromartie of the Ethics and Public Policy Center. "I find it refreshing that we don't have a president coming out of church with a large Bible under his arm." Conservatives relish this opportunity for a little gratuitous Clinton-bashing. In private, however, they admit the explanation doesn't hold up. "I really don't get it," one prominent Bush partisan told me. "There's no reason why the president couldn't find a church around here if he wanted to."
The excuses offered by conservatives for why Bush doesn't go to church are pathetic — but even more pathetic are the efforts to bash Clinton in the process. Conservative defenders don't have any good responses to this because they have so much invested in the meme that Republicans go to church more often than Democrats and if that meme is going to mean anything, it's difficult to deal with the fact that Clinton and Carter went to church regularly but Bush never does.
The idea that Americans who vote Democrat and don't much go to church are no worse, no less religious, and perhaps not that far different from their beloved President Bush must be giving headaches to the few religious conservatives who actually trouble themselves to think about this (most probably ignore it and pretend that the issue doesn't exist).
And, yes, this is unfortunately an issue. It shouldn't be but it is because conservatives (and not just religious conservatives) have made it one. They did so first of all by touting surveys showing greater church attendance among those who vote Republican as if that were significant in some manner. They did so secondly by the intense focus they have tried to place on John Kerry's religiosity. After doing all of this they can't very well complain about similar scrutiny of Bush's religiosity and religious beliefs (which are generally unknown, even to White House staffers).
Read More:

How do you know he doesn’t have a private family worship service at the White House or wherever he might be on Sunday morning? If he went to a local church, morons like you would be complaining about the traffic and inconvenience caused by the Secret Service securing the location. You really didn’t even think before writing this, did you?
Christianity is an organized religion where communal services, traditions, and worship are all key. Once you stop attending communal worship, you stop being part of the Christian community in many ways.
Other presidents, like Clinton and Carter, went to church regularly without causing problems. Did you think before raising that “objection”?
It’s interesting to note that George Bush could not admit a mistake until he quit going to church. This says a great deal about the suitability of conservative Christians for elective office.
The truth is revieled to the president, and he knows he is wasting his time.
Christianity as defined by who requires communal services and traditions? Christianity is simply the way of following Christ – any further restrictions in place were created by man in forming a specific church – not all christian churches hold to the same beliefs, though belief in Christ would be the central pillar, otherwise they’re not Christ-ian .. No where did Christ teach that you had to go to X number of services a week or hold to a particular tradition..
“No where did Christ teach that you had to go to X number of services a week or hold to a particular tradition..”
No where did Christ teach “war and death to the evil-doers” but somehow it’s a lesson many fundamentalists promulgate. Onward Christian soldiers.
And exactly what church have you seen out riding around with guns shooting people? Stop believing what everyone else tells you. War happens, it’s part of life on this planet – human nature is not to get along with everyone you meet – and sometimes force is required to stop evil men from doing evil.