Summary
Title: A Rumor About the Jews: Reflections on Antisemitism and the 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion'
Author: Stephen Eric Bronner
Publisher: St. Martin's Press
ISBN: 0195169565
Pros:
Clear, understanable introduction to development of modern antisemitism
Provides insights into how and why modern reactionaries identify humanists as 'the enemy'
Cons:
None
Description:
Explains context in which the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was written and gained influence
Shows how modern anti-semitism is largely a reaction against modernity
Demonstrates the dangers of allowing reactionary forces to identify any one group as scapegoats
Book Review
Why should this topic interest nonbelievers and skeptics? There are two obvious reasons and one less obvious reason. First, the 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' represented a continuation and political expansion of traditional Christian antisemitism. Understanding it can help explain how religious opposition to Judaism developed into the political and racial movement known as antisemitism:
- The Protocols unifies the religious, the social, and the political elements of Judeophobia in a particularly striking way. It expresses the resentment of a Christian world against the undermining of its faith and it seeks to close public life to the Jews. ... The Protocols made Judeophobia part of a more "total" and distinctly modern, form of political anti-modernism: it crystallized the idea of the Jew as scapegoat.
The second reason is that the 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' is perhaps one of the world's most famous and persistent forgeries. Gullible people have believed its veracity almost since it was published, and even though it has been decisively debunked, it continues to hold people's attention and influence the political machinations of far-right extremists. American militias, for example, treat it as a sort of scripture and basic explanation for why they must exist.
Finally, and perhaps more interestingly, the 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' is about a lot more than the threat of world domination by Jews. Indeed, much antisemitism is not about the Jews - they are simply made to be the scapegoats for the fears and problems of members of the extreme right. When the Protocols, or any other similar document, complains about what the Jews are doing, what we find is in fact a litany of what people fear most about the modern world.

The Protocols, for this reason, are an example of what traditionalists have long found most distressing about modernity. It is a diatribe not so much against Judaism as it is against the Enlightenment and the liberation it represented from traditional restrictions on religion, gender, economics and social status:
- The Protocols solidifies the connection between the true believers in Christianity, those nineteenth-century reactionaries intent on combating the Enlightenment, and the fanatics of a seemingly antireligious and revolutionary Nazi movement desirous of establishing the primacy of a single race. Christian institutions and the first genuinely reactionary movements, no less than the Nazis, overwhelmingly aligned themselves against the modern ideas and values generated in the age of democratic revolution: secularism and science, rationalism and materialism, tolerance and equality, capitalism and socialism, liberalism and marxism. Antisemitism was never simply an independent impulse. It was always part of a broader project directed against the civilizing impulse of reason and the dominant forces of modernity.



