Summary
Title: The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong to Get Ahead
Author: David Callahan
Publisher: Harcourt
ISBN: 0151010188
Pro:
Good resource on corruption in a variety of fields
Maddening stories of horrible dishonesty, intriguing explanations and excuses by the cheaters
Religion is not offered as an antidote to cheating
Con:
No predictions and scientific tests to evaluate Callahans main thesis
No comparisons with cheating in other nations
Description:
Exploration of how and why people cheat more in America today
Argues that hyper-competitive environment makes cheating more attractive
Suggests some possible solutions for beginning to reverse the cheating trends
Book Review
Some Christians might argue that any increase in dishonesty is simply an expression of humanitys sinfulness and inability to act morally independent of God. Since Americans have become less Christian and more secular over time, of course things would be getting worse in America.
Yet a more useful analysis requires studying the situations in which people are less honest than in the past, the factors which might be contributing to this, and then look for commonalities and parallels.
This is precisely what David Callahan attempts to offer in his book The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong to Get Ahead. Callahan interviewed numerous people around the country and studied patterns of cheating in contexts as diverse as school testing, corporate boardrooms, pharmaceutical sales, overbilling lawyers, and applications for learning deficiencies. If there is any commonality in the various forms of cheating occurring in these situations, Callahan believes that it involves Americas increasingly brutal competition in American society.
Callahans argument is deceptively simple but still compelling: in the American economy the benefits of winning have increased dramatically while the detriments of losing have worsened just as much. The middle ground of simply doing reasonably well has eroded. People are generally willing to follow laws they believe are legitimate and not cheat because the social and legal costs are too high.
Things change, however, when people perceive that laws or standards benefit some unjustly while the costs of not cheating rise. As a consequence, the desire to decease ones chances of being one of the losers has grown so large that benefits of cheating have begun to outweigh the social, legal, and even ethical costs. Not cheating is perceived as something only chumps do.
Furthermore, as cheating increases, the chances of getting caught and/or being punished decrease (white-collar crime, which costs America billions each year, is far more lightly punished than average street crime). This creates a feedback loop in which cheating only becomes more desirable while not cheating becomes a sure way to lose.
When the rules of the game mean that many cheat and nearly all who cheat not only dont get caught, but in fact benefit from it, the incentives to cheat are too high to resist. Basically honest people begin to cheat out of the very justified fear that, if they dont, theyll fall behind everyone else in todays fast-moving economy.
Parents, for example, will do almost anything to help their kids succeed in getting admitted to a good school which can mean a tremendous difference in ones lifetime earning potential. This only reinforces students perception that cheating is a necessity for getting ahead in life.
Where Callahans book shines is in how he amasses a wealth of examples of people cheating, often apparently for the reasons he argues for. This is also perhaps a bit depressing because youll read so many examples of cheating and dishonesty that youll just want to slap someone.
Where Callahans book falls short is the absence of any predictions and scientific tests that would lend something beyond anecdotes and reasoned speculation to his argument. It shouldnt be hard to construct some decent tests for this put people in situations where the costs of losing are small and then other situations where the costs are high and see what happens to the relative rates of cheating. If they follow the trends Callahan describes, his thesis will be greatly strengthened. Comparison studies with cheating in other nations would also be very helpful here.



