You are here:About>Religion & Spirituality>Agnosticism / Atheism
About.comAgnosticism / Atheism

Evolution and Creationism in Public Schools

Index of Court Cases

--> -->
• Court Decisions
• Newest Cases
• Religious Holidays
• Schools & Religion
• Government & Religion
• Church Disputes
• Creationism
• Jehovah's Witnesses
• Minority Religions
• Privacy
• Free Speech

• Site Resources
• Main Site Index

• What is Atheism?
• Religion & Theism
• Skepticism & Logic
• Arguments for / against Gods
• Evolution vs. Creationism
• Religious Timelines
• Hate Mail
• Glossary
• Book Reviews

• Chat Room
Join others in the Agnosticism/Atheism chat!

• Discussion Forum
Do you have an opinion about this page? Make it known on the Discussion Forum!

Should schools be able to teach scientific creationism? Should schools teach about evolution? Is evolution a religion? These are just some of the questions courts at all levels have had to wrestle with due to the attempts by certain religious groups to stop the teaching of evolution, which they find objectionable, and replace it with teaching from their own religious traditions.


Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)
The Supreme Court found that Arkanas' law prohibiting the teaching of evolution was unconstitutional because the motivation was based on a literal reading of Genesis, not science.

McClean v. Arkansas (1981)
A federal judge found that Arkanas' "blanced treatment" law mandating equal treatment of creation science with evolution was unconstitutional.

Segraves v. California (1981)
A California judge ruled that teaching evolution in public school science classes does not infringe upon the rights of any students or parents to the free exercise of their religion, even if they sincerely believe that evolution is contrary to their religious beliefs.

Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)
In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court invalidated Louisiana's "Creationism Act" because it violated the Establishment Clause.

Webster v. New Lenox (1990)
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that school boards have the right to prohibit teaching creationism because such lessons would constitute religious advocacy and, hence, such restrictions do not constitute an infringement on a teacher's free speech rights.

Peloza v. Capistrano (1994)
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that a teacher does not have a right to teach creationism in a biology class, that "evolutionism" is not a religion or world view, and that the government can restrict the speech of employees while they are on the job.

Freiler v. Tangipahoa (1999)
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found that a disclaimer to be read before teaching about evolution ultimately had the effect of furthering religious interests and was therefore unconstitutional.

LeVake v. Independent School District (2001)
A federal district court finds that a school may remove a teacher from teaching a biology class when that teacher, a creationist, cannot adequately teach evolution.

Major Sources:

The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Kermit L. Hall, ed. Compare Prices

The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions. Kermit L. Hall, ed. Compare Prices

The Godless Court? Supreme Court Decisions on Church-State Relationships. Ronald B. Flowers. Compare Prices

The Godless Constitution: The Case Against Religious Correctness. Isaac Kramnick & R. Laurence Moore. Compare Prices

The Constitution and Religion: Leading Supreme Court Cases on Church and State. Robert S. Alley Compare Prices

The Supreme Court on Church and State. Robert S. Alley Compare Prices


Back To: Court Decisions on Religious Liberty (main page)

-->
From Austin Cline,
Your Guide to Agnosticism / Atheism.
FREE Newsletter. Sign Up Now!
 All Topics | Email Article | Print this Page | |
Advertising Info | News & Events | Work at About | SiteMap | Reprints | HelpOur Story | Be a Guide
User Agreement | Ethics Policy | Patent Info. | Privacy Policy©2008 About, Inc., A part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.