1. Home
  2. Religion & Spirituality
  3. Agnosticism / Atheism
photo of Austin Cline

Austin's Atheism Blog

By Austin Cline, About.com Guide to Atheism since 1998

Outing Barbara Bradley Hagerty

Friday May 21, 2004
I've commented more than once on the religion reporting of Barbara Bradley Hagerty - her intense and less-then-honest reports on John Kerry's Catholicism, for example, and her connections to the evangelical World Journalism Institute. Now there is a new blog dedicated to unmasking her partisan reporting - and some interesting things have been revealed already.

Biblio writes:

Her religion reporting for NPR has focused mainly on Christianity, including a report on the Christian Science Church, in which she did not disclose that she was herself a former member of the Church. ... More troubling still is her association with Howard Ahmanson's Fieldstead and Co. and Fieldstead Foundation. Ahmanson is a California millionaire who uses his trust fund to finance right-wing Christian, anti-gay, anti-evolution groups and politicians. He was previously associated with Christian Reconstructionism, which advocates a Biblically-based government for the U.S. ... Hagerty has spoken twice at the Summer Institute of Journalism, a program run by the Council for Christian Colleges and University and funded by the Fieldstead Foundation. ... Hagerty's keynote address to the 2003 National Student Media Convention was also sponsored by Fieldstead and Co.

Apparently, these sponsored lectures are a violation of the Ethics Guides of her employer, NPR:

NPR journalists may only accept fees from educational or nonprofit groups not engaged in significant lobbying or political activity. Determining whether a group engages in significant lobbying or political activity is the responsibility of the journalist seeking permission, and all information must be fully disclosed to the journalist's supervisor. ... NPR journalists may not speak to groups where the journalist's appearance might put in question his or her impartiality. Such instances include situations where the employee's appearance may appear to endorse the agenda of a group or organization.

Currently, it seems like the NPR Ombudsman is denying that Barbara Bradley Hagerty has violated their ethics code - but it seems difficult to come up with any charitable interpretation of circumstances that would allow the Ombudsman to at least think they are correct. Hagerty has received money from Fieldstead Foundation to speak. Fieldstead Foundation engages in lobbying and political activity - as Biblio notes, they are listed on the American Association of Political Consultants' 2003 membership roster. Taking money from a group that engages in lobbying and political activity is a violation of NPR's "Ethics Guide." Period. End of story.

But NPR doesn't want to do anything about this. Tell me again how they are just a shill for the Left?

Read More:

Comments

March 7, 2008 at 10:33 am
(1) Jim Millington says:

you might want to check out this piece she did on the Baha’i Faith. It was very good. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87809254

October 9, 2008 at 5:19 am
(2) Don says:

So what? You find free speech troubling when morals are applied? Or is your liberal, anti all things decent mentality to be applied only to godless and perverted liberals? What a joke.

October 9, 2008 at 9:19 am
(3) Austin Cline says:

So what?

So… I think that unethical “news” reporting is a bad idea. Is it your position that unethical behavior by journalists isn’t important?

You find free speech troubling when morals are applied?

Where have I stated or implied this?

Or is your liberal, anti all things decent mentality to be applied only to godless and perverted liberals?

It’s nothing more than bigotry to suggest that being liberal and/or atheist means being “anti all things decent.” It’s no better, morally speaking, than saying the same about blacks or Jews. A person taking such a position can’t be treated as having anything serious or substantive to say about the groups they are attacking.

Curiously, this expression of bigotry manages to distract attention from the topic of the above article: partisan religious reporting from someone pretending to be objective.

What a joke.

No, the “joke” is the large number of bigoted religious believers who pretend to have moral superiority over others simply because those others fail to have the same religious and theistic beliefs.

Or maybe that’s tragedy rather than comedy. Sometimes the line between the two is difficult to discern.

October 10, 2008 at 8:15 pm
(4) John Hanks says:

Crook religion succeeds because it has not conscience whatsoever. There is no moral conflict when everything is scripted for a robot. One of the most infuriating things about liberals is their endless concern with being morally correct. Moralizing divides the mind and slows liberals down.

October 12, 2008 at 1:52 am
(5) Zack says:

One of the most infuriating things about liberals is their endless concern with being morally correct. Moralizing divides the mind and slows liberals down. — John Hanks on October 10, 2008 at 8:15 pm

Um, John? Are you implying that only liberals are concerned with acting morally?

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore Agnosticism / Atheism

More from About.com

  1. Home
  2. Religion & Spirituality
  3. Agnosticism / Atheism

©2008 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.