Philosopher: Enemy of the State in Iran
New Scientist has an interview with him, where he says:
Totalitarianism is absolutely a modern phenomenon. In the past, kings were despots but they were not totalitarian. They weren't able to put their hands on science and philosophy. There was no widespread plan to limit scientists, philosophers and other academics. If there were restrictions, they came from religion or fellow philosophers rather than the political system.
Scientific revolutions and political revolutions are similar in many ways. You cannot plan them, they just happen, and you become wiser after the event. After the revolution there was no one dominant view. There were secular people, moderate Muslims, radical Muslims and so on. Revolutions tend to result in totalitarianism. People like me were in it to make it more moderate.
More Muslims like Soroush could do a lot to improve and advance both Islam generally and Muslim nations in particular. It's a shame that radical Islamists prevent people like Soroush from speaking and teaching.
Read More:


Comments
No comments yet. Leave a Comment