1. Religion & Spirituality

Discuss in my forum

Austin Cline

Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan: Blasphemy is a Crime Against Humanity

By September 26, 2012

Follow me on:

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan thinks that blasphemy should be banned as a crime against humanity. And when he says "blasphemy" he seems to have in mind specifically "whatever offends Muslims." So basically, absolutely anything can be banned so long as it offends enough Muslims who complain loudly enough.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 2011
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 2011
Photo: Sean Gallup/Getty

What Prime Minister Erdogan wants to do is make certain thoughts and beliefs crimes. The only reason he has for this is the fact that certain thoughts and beliefs are offensive to some Muslims. Is that a reasonable foundation to make something a crime, though? Not in any civilized society. So why is Erdogan trying to make Turkey less civilized?

If Muslims have the power to ban some thought or word or belief by claiming offense, can I have that right too? Can I claim that their protests offend me and then have those protests banned? Can I claim that their Qur'an offends me and so have it banned? If not, then this isn't really about protecting people's freedom of belief; instead, it's about protecting religion from being criticized or challenged.

"I am the prime minister of a nation, of which most are Muslims and that has declared anti-semitism a crime against humanity. But the West hasn't recognized Islamophobia as a crime against humanity -- it has encouraged it. [The film director] is saying he did this to provoke the fundamentalists among Muslims. When it is in the form of a provocation, there should be international legal regulations against attacks on what people deem sacred, on religion. As much as it is possible to adopt international regulations, it should be possible to do something in terms of domestic law."

He further noted, "Freedom of thought and belief ends where the freedom of thought and belief of others start. You can say anything about your thoughts and beliefs, but you will have to stop when you are at the border of others' freedoms. I was able to include Islamophobia as a hate crime in the final statement of an international meeting in Warsaw."

Source: Today's Zaman

Erdogan's comments here are ambiguous - almost to the point of being incoherent, which may be the point. After all, the less clear you are the harder it is for critics to pin you down on what you are saying. This is important when you're talking about criminalizing belief and thought.

When he says "You can say anything about your thoughts and beliefs, but you will have to stop when you are at the border of others' freedoms," does he mean that you cannot say anything about others' beliefs, or merely that you cannot say anything critical or negative about others' beliefs?

His statement "Freedom of thought and belief ends where the freedom of thought and belief of others start" is clearly a reference to the idea that "your freedom to swing your fist ends where my nose starts," but the analogy is strained to say the least. You swinging your fist causes demonstrable harm once it reaches my nose, but what demonstrable harm is created by a belief or a thought?

Of course apologists for censorship and oppression like Erdogan will never even try to demonstrate that thoughts or beliefs cause real harm. Since the goal is simply to protect Islam from critique, all they need to do is show that someone, somewhere is offended. That's certainly easy enough to do.

What's significant, though, is the fact that Erdogan thinks that Islam in particular or even religion generally need to be protected at all. It's significant that he wants to make blasphemy a crime which implies that he thinks his god needs to be protected. This all means that he and like-minded believers all regard their religions as weak and impotent. That's why the need the police powers of the state for protection.

September 29, 2012 at 2:40 am
(1) ullrich fischer says:

The existence of infidels (apostate or never Muslims) offends many Muslims. The existence of Shia Muslims offends Sunnis and vice-versa. Having Blasphemy laws on the books in any country is an invitation to civil war and/or genocide. The Catholic Church had a similar attitude to non-Catholics before The Enlightenment. It is disheartening that the leader of the Islamic country that had made the most progress toward rationality and religious tolerance is now led by someone who clearly wants to turn back the clock 300+ years.

September 29, 2012 at 3:53 am
(2) Kim says:

Are Moslems more sensitive than other religions? in which case, why?

September 29, 2012 at 8:40 am
(3) Borsia says:

Funny how Muslims have no problems slamming and blasphemy agaisnt other religions and gods.
While I think it a very bad idea they do have the power to ban anything they like in their own countries.
But when they interact with the rest of the world they have no special rights what so ever.
They need to grasp the fact that “their god” is just that and nothing more, that their religion is a minority and that they shouldn’t expect to get things their way outside of their borders.
Whether they want to travel or live in foreign lands, or even interact with non-muslims through various media, they can’t expect their religious beliefs to be given any more weight than others, or none for that matter.

September 29, 2012 at 4:39 pm
(4) Barbayat says:

I am so sick of any religious person telling me that I should not blaspheme. I can blaspheme all day long, I don’t belong to any faith.

I think most religions are offensive, rude and spit in the face of reality – I am not running around demanding that people do not make my head hurt with their ignorance, hate and bigotry on pain of torture, imprisonement or death.

As long as religous people still do that, I always will see them as immoral and primitive. A society were you can’t speak freely about religion is not a society that values free speech at all. Sadly, that seems to be the new trend in almost all of them nowadays.

October 1, 2012 at 9:39 pm
(5) David says:

Organized religion is the biggest crime against our species.

October 6, 2012 at 9:20 pm
(6) Todd Peissig says:

I agree wholeheatedly with Barbayat. WELL SAID ! ! I always say to people whom I am having a religious discussion with “If something I said offends your religious belief, please let me reassure you it is strictly intentional.”

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.