It seems very clear to me that when they sat down to write something about atheists and atheism, they decided to rely entirely on their religious ideology instead of spending even a second doing the most basic research. What this means is that the "atheism" and "atheists" they write about aren't the atheism and atheists of the real world, but rather are just props in a religious ideology. These Christians aren't writing about real people with real histories, real feelings, and real interests, but cardboard cutouts that can be invested with whatever nonsense the religious ideology happens to require at any given moment.
Joey Nelson writes something at his Spiritual Questions Blog which is, in my opinion, a very good (or perhaps very sad) example of this phenomenon:
Perhaps, in an unguarded moment, an atheist will look up this Thanksgiving and say, "Thank you" to the One who has made their life possible. Otherwise, the thing about atheism is that you have no One to thank.
Did Joey Nelson ask any atheists about what or whom they have to thank on Thanksgiving? Certainly not. Did Joey Nelson spend even a minute doing a single search on Google or Yahoo? Of course not. Joey Nelson is relying entirely on his own ideology to answer his own question -- instead of investing any time or effort to find out what or whom atheists might thank, he assumed that without any gods to thank, there can't be anyone to thank.
Now, it should go without saying that asking an atheist about whom they might have to thank or doing a Google search aren't unusual or unexpected activities. You don't have to have a Ph.D. in philosophy or science to think of doing such things. So why didn't Joey Nelson bother? I can't answer in his specific case, but my experience with so many Christians behaving in basically the same way leads me to believe that they simply don't care.
What real atheists feel, think, and do doesn't matter. To a certain extent, we aren't real human beings with real feelings, thoughts, desires, and ideas. We are objects in their ideology and targets for their apologetics rather than independent persons who might have thoughts and positions that don't match up with what the believers' ideology tells them. If by chance some example of what we actually think intrudes on their narcissistic musings, it's all too common for them to deny that this can be true and insist that we "really" think or believe whatever their favorite apologists told them.
I think that it's fair to reduce matters to a fairly simply formula: people who care at all what you actually think, believe, or feel will ask or make some effort to find out. People who don't care what you actually think, believe, or feel will just make lots of assumptions about you based on what they have read or been told by others (and those others almost certainly don't know you) and insist that you fit into some hole created by their ideology. Anyone who says that they care what you actually think or feel but then proceeds to tell you what you really think or feel without asking is not being truthful or honest about your or their intentions.


Why, it’s specifically the atheists that have plenty of people to thank. Christians like this wouldn’t exactly give credit where credit is due, like thank their parents, friends, or themselves.
In the end, you have to wonder why these individuals feel compelled to slander and lie. I don’t spend my days attacking theists, and have done nothing to earn their anger, hatred and scorn. I try to live my life, and leave others be, except when my rights are threatened.
It seems to me to be a weakness of faith. If they were secure in their faith, in their beliefs, they wouldn’t need to attack those who didn’t believe. They are so insecure, their faith so fragile and breakable, that they have to lash out, insult, demean, and lie about those who merely do not believe as they do.
Just as homophobes often turn out to be closeted, self-hating homosexuals, I expect many of these people have very little real belief in what they profess. Perhaps they’re the real closet atheists.
Why would an atheist give thanks to a being that he or she doesn’t believe in? It sounds very much like Joey Nelson thinks that deep down, all atheists really believe in God, but are just in denial.
Does Joey Nelson only thank God on Thanksgiving? If so, it would seem that he believes that God is the source of all things good in this world, and that humans are wicked sinners who do no good (except through the grace of God). Very sad.
My wife and mother-in-law commented how Thanksgiving must mean nothing to me, since I don’t “believe in anything.”
That was a bit of a shock, and I could only respond that the day is still meaningful even though I don’t believe in supernatural deities. It’s a reminder to be appreciative of family, friends, that I have a stable job and a reasonably successful financial status that enables us to help our kids when needed, pay our bills, etc., when there are many who are unable to do that.
Although the roots of Thanksgiving are giving thanks to a god (much like, believe it or not! the roots of Christmas actually have to do with Christ – crazy I know!) i didn’t realize that god was the only person/thing that deserved thanks.
My mistake. Perhaps they should rename the holiday. OR perhaps they should institute another holiday (hey, maybe on the same day even!) where we could thank people for things. What a concept!
Actually feeling offended by the concept that I have “no one to thank” = snarky response to stupid statement.
I certainly know I don’t have people who think that way to thank for anything except prejudice and small-minded, illogical, insensitivity.
I’d say thanks for those un-admirable qualities, but hey… I don’t have anyone to thank.
This is my answer to Joey”
Joey,
I have me to thank for all the good stuff that has happened in my life.
I also have me to blame if I screw up, which I haven’t.
You seem to think that without a mythical entity to watch over you and guide you, you will be lost. Have you no sense of personal accomplishment? I would doubt that you would allow just any one to tell you how to run your life, yet you allow a pastor or priest to dictate to you. Your pastor or priest is in the business of religion and will definitely tell you what to do. Why not just think for yourself for a change. I have never been involved in any kind of religion in my life and have never regretted my life style. I am 74 years old and have lived a good responsible life without a divine force to guide me. I do not fear what you fear, Hell, and I do not expect what you expect, Heaven.
Until your God shows up and does something useful for humanity, so then and until then I will not think he exists.
I am not alone in this, there a millions of people that want proof of this god’s abilities and are not prepared to accept the bible’s inconsistencies as a realistic belief system.
The god of the three desert religions doesn’t cut it, Joey.
This god doesn’t make any more sense than Zeus, Thor,
or any of the thousand other gods that have had their chance throughout history. They have all failed miserably
at doing a god-like job for their believers. That would be because none of them have ever existed except in the minds of uneducated and delusional people. At least that what I believe, take it or leave it..
Theists view athiests like they view gays and lesbians:
children rebelling
no matter how old you are or your life experience
clearly you are a willful child to not follow god’s plan and marry an opposite gender person and be moral
they cannot accept, imagine, comprehend or understand
that atheists and/or gays and lesbians
are one or both precisely because they have done a lot of thinking, consideration and searching
and come to a different conclusion about themselves and life than the normal – by which I mean average – person who is a heterosexual beleiver
we are simply not thinking adults who are self determined
which is different than “free will” but choosing to follow god’s path so not really having any free will
This reminds me of people,especially jocks, thanking god for their achievements when in reality it was their own talent and hard work that resulted in their success.Go figure.
I am thankful to many people for their positive influence on my life. I’m even thankful to my dog for her unwavering loyalty. But a vulgar, mythical “god”? What a joke.
Now… I am an outsider and I never have understood this “Thanksgiving” bit.
From my understanding it is saying thank you God for not having us go on starving as you’ve been letting us do heretofore. Or letting us stay here in the land of the Indians, who, incidentally, have been awfully kind, and a damned sight more helpful than you have been up until now..
From my perspective I think it was the Red man who should have been be thanked not spanked as happened later.
Those early Limeys came, stole, raped, killed and plundered. Yeah I guess it could be understood why one would try to apportion blame in the name of thanks to some unknown, unseen, unanswerable, imaginary being.
tomedgar@halenet.com.au
Thank the turkey, who gave up its life so that you may live.
I’ve always felt guilty and ashamed to thank a so-called “Almighty God” who capriciously “gives” ME so much while leaving so many others to languish.
Yo, Joey…..it’s possible to be thankful FOR rather than thankful TO.
This year, as in years past, I was, and am, thankful FOR my general health and well-being, as well as that of most of my family and friends. I was, and am, thankful FOR the ongoing opportunity I have to enjoy my life and theirs, especially because, as an atheist and non-believer in anything supernatural, including survival of or recovery from death, I believe all our lives to be precious, finite things. I was, and am, also thankful FOR the general peacefulness of the corner of the globe I’ve been lucky enough to inhabit for a half century plus.
As busy as life gets, it seems wise to have periods of time, like Thanksgiving Day here in the U.S., set aside by custom for enjoying and expressing this thankfulness. Else, it seems likely it’d fall into the category of “things most of us intend to get around to, someday”. And we all know when “someday” usually comes.
@Tamar
I agree with Tom Edgar on this. I don’t know why this holiday would be about giving thanks to God. It’s not like the food and all the other resources Pilgrims needed fell from the sky, isn’t it? And why do you feel the need to rename a holiday or invent a new one for thanking people? After all, it’s not called Godthanking, but Thanksgiving, which makes it perfectly neutral with regards to whom you’re giving thanks to.
You guys say that we are actually worse of by believing, and that we are taking a risk by believing. You say that by not believing, if there is a God, then he will be less angry with you than us because we believed in a different God. Isn’t that admitting that there may be a God somewhere? We argue with your statements about how there can be no God not because we are afraid, or losing faith. We argue because we love you all, as we are supposed too, and dont want you to deny God, and pay for it. I’m not threatening, it’s not my place to judge you. I’m just sad that good, intelligent people refuse to accept Him.
Turner,
No, it’s not an admission that there might be a god. It’s sidestepping the issue of God’s existence to make a succinct refutation of the Christian claim that it is safer to believe in God than to risk hell by not believing.
More and more people everyday are coming to the realization that Christianity is just another mythology. Feel free to join us.
This has to be the biggest piece of crap article ever written. I’m catholic, but I don’t go around trahing what others lelieve or don’t believe. Thanksgiving isn’t a religious holiday or any thing of the sort. You don’t have to believe on anything to be thankful. Get a F’ing brain
I wonder if Joey nelson is one of those theists who believe their god is the only reason life has any value. If so, it wouldn’t be suprising that he can’t imagine who and/or what an atheist has to be thankful for. We can’t expect someone like this to appreciate that family, friends, etc. are what’s truly responsible for adding to the quality of our lives. Apparently god is capable of blinding people to the things right in front of them.
Besides gays and atheists, theists also don’t usually like childfree people, either. As a childfree atheist, I get “bingoed” by the childed, especially the more religious people for not following the “life script” of having kids and following “god’s plan” for everyone by breeding.
So while you’re all busy being thankful “for” what you’ve got TO whom do you send the thank you note? I loved the comment from one atheist about never having screwed things up in his life. Definitely material for the theists who talk not about “Atheists” but “Itheists.” Replacing one infallible deity with another. Loved the comment about “thank” not “spank.” To those of you who consider religion just another mythology I suggest you do some serious study of mythology that too many atheists consider a truncheon, not something from which they can learn. Google Joseph Campbell. Just because it’s a myth doesn’t mean that it’s not true. Hey, it’s ok for atheists to give thanks on Thanksgiving. I don’t have to be a fan to enjoy a good game of baseball even when my team isn’t playing.
Question for you atheists out there…and it appears that on here there is nothing but atheists: Let’s say one of your best friends is a non-proselytizing theist. You accept an invitation to dine with his family on Thanksgiving. Knowing that you’ll be dining with theists who will give thanks to God at the beginning of the meal (i.e., the blessing…”Bless us, our Lord, and these thy gifts which we are about to receive….”) do you:
a) decline the invitation
b) hold your hands in your lap as your hosts extend theirs as they are about to say the blessing
c) arrive late so as to avoid the blessing
d) tell everyone that you don’t believe in God and therefore will not participate in the blessing
e) hold hands with your hosts and say nothing
f) ask your host not to say the blessing in deference to your beliefs
g) something else?
@Great Awakening – personally I would choose option e. if you attended dinner with atheists (assuming that you would do such a thing), what would you do? say a silent blessing to yourself? excuse yourself to another room and say a prayer? whatever your choice, i assume you would be polite in your actions when in the home of your atheist friends, just as most atheists would be polite in the home of their religious friends.
(21) Great Awakening said:
“…I suggest you do some serious study of mythology that too many atheists consider a truncheon, not something from which they can learn. Google Joseph Campbell. Just because it’s a myth doesn’t mean that it’s not true.”
I say…BS!
Just from that statement, I’d say YOU really don’t show too much, in depth knowledge, about Joseph Campbell, who died, by the way in 1987. I, and indeed, many atheists, respect highly Campbell’s rather ground breaking work, lectures, and long teaching career at Sarah Lawrence College; but a whole lot of research, both historically AND archeologically, has been done regarding “Mythology” SINCE Campbell’s demise. Indeed, Campbell, an ex-Catholic, was either an atheist or at the very least, an agnostic RE any notion of a god. For him, that was, mythologically speaking, the impenetrable…”Unknown” territory. Which is somewhat more akin to a form of absolutely IM-personal “Deism”.
As to relevant matters since Campbell, that would include other contemporary authors, more recent Archaeologically related ‘diggings’, as well as much more wide spread and FREE and your EASY ACCESS to additional information existing…on the Internet.
As to your…
“Question for you atheists out there…and it appears that on here there is nothing but atheists: Let’s say one of your best friends is a non-proselytizing theist.”…yada, yada.
Ummm…Last time I checked…this IS an ‘official’ atheist Site…D’uh!…so why the apparent ’surprise’?
And as a long ago childhood brainwashed EX-Catholic myself, I recognize your “Blessing” shtick as the standard, memorized, Catholic Catechism “Grace before meals” version.
Personally…and I DO have longtime friends and family who are still captivated by stubborn, long lingering, brainwashed belief…due to distance and other factors, I don’t really get invitations to holiday din-dins. If I did, I’d probably opt for your “a)” choice; but not purely because of non-religious sentiments. If I were in attendance, I might just add, politely, a personal “NON-imaginary god” comment; like referencing, beyond the usual limited thanking of all those humans who actually WORKED at producing the meal…a reference to the Native Americans’ tradition of thanking the animal “Diva” of the…Turkey(?)…for IT’S sacrifice. And referencing, broadly perhaps…speaking “Mythologically”…all the other animals and plants that are often painfully sacrificed to satisfy our enormously voracious human appetites.
Yeah…I’m sure that’d keep them from inviting me to any subsequent dinners…
“Boo-hoo!”.
Which suits me just fine, these days. At almost 70, I prefer staying comfortably in my rented “cave”, anyway.
Just a suggestion, (dear?) “(not-so-?)Great Awakening”:
check this author out, for one, regarding some more recent, in depth, “mythology” research:
[Pardon the repeated posting, Austin..?]
http://www.freethoughtnation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=2946
And, by the way, to everyone…
Please enjoy your bloody (or non-bloody?) “Sacrificial Thanksgiving Din-dins”!
Bon appetit?
To those who are responsible for that which deserves thanks. Whom else?
There is a post about this at Beliefnet, I liked it.
http://blog.beliefnet.com/stuffchristianculturelikes
What if I find I really don’t have anyone to thank on Thanksgiving? Does that prove there is no God/
WE ate dinner out yesterday with family and friends, six of us (and the new grand). I gave a toast “to new friends, new life, and the old husband who has managed to stay alive one more year.” The husbeast said he deserved it (he has a terminal illness). It was a lovely day and no one invoked the sky daddy.
I left a msg on the original blog. Thanks Austin.
This old saw.
God is no abusive parent. If an atheist finds out he has been wrong, he is simply forgiven like a prodigal son.
If theists could think objectively about theism and antheism or put themselves in the mindset of an atheist to try to understand that perspective, they wouldn’t remain theists long!
Theists pray and atheists think.
I have no idea who Joey Nelson is, but he’s simply borrowing an idea from Dante Gabriel Rossetti who said, “The worst moment for the atheist is when he is really thankful and has nobody to thank.”
Re: “Even a second of basic research.” That probably is true most of the time, but on this issue it’s simply a matter of logic. If there is no one greater than you, you have no one to thank. (Clearly this is not referring to moments of specific gratitude for gifts or acts of kindnesses received. This is referring to the wonder of life and the splendor and greatness of the universe[s])
There’s not virtue in borrowing an obviously bad idea. Besides, the frequent attribution of that quote to Rossetti never comes with a specific citation. People say he said it, but it’s not found in anything written by him. The earliest reference comes from Chesterton, noted for his anti-atheist bigotry, and even he doesn’t provide a specific source for it.
Poor logic, you mean.
That’s obviously false, as would be demonstrated by even a second of research – i.e., reading the article linked to above. It lists lots and lots of people we have to thank.
It’s still obviously false. For the wonder of life you have your parents to thank because they brought you life as well as all those who are responsible for helping make your life possible (family, society). After all, life is only a “wonder” if you have it and can enjoy it. For the universe, you can thank all those who help make it possible for you to understand that it is great, for example the scientists who reveal what the universe is. After all, the universe isn’t “great” if you know nothing about it and cannot contemplate it.