What do you think? Who caused the bloodshed at the march?
Was it the young man, a quiet Talmudic scholar, father of five, with no police record, who stated that he acted "in the name of G-D..."
...Or was it the left-wing politicians and the left-wing judiciary, who forced this abomination on an unwilling populace?
So the young man who violently assaulted another human being wasn't really responsible for his actions. He doesn't need to take personal responsibility for his violence because the responsibility actually lies with liberal politicians who didn't enforce the things this man wanted and didn't restrict the civil rights of people this man deemed unworthy of equality. He didn't get his way, so he can't be held responsible for violently lashing out at others.
This isn't just an academic exercise, of course. We should be very worried that justifications for religious violence like this will be used proactively and not just retrospectively because there are an awful lot of religious extremists whose opposition to equality and freedom remains quiet but could break out violently if given half an excuse. Someone with a violent and bigoted nature could be easily swayed by such arguments into thinking that they can and should behave violently in the future.