1. Religion & Spirituality

Discuss in my forum

Austin Cline

Good Will and Ethics

By , About.com GuideJune 1, 2006

Follow me on:

It's common to think of ethical behavior as requiring the product of good results, but a focus on results is not sufficient. In addition to producing more good than evil, we should also strive to want to do good — in other words, our general will or attitude must be good as well.

Paul Kurtz writes in the April/May 2005 issue of Free Inquiry:

Being of good will means that we are not mean-spirited or surly, despairing or nihilistic, vindictive or hateful. We should try to be affirmative about what life offers, not fearful or defensive; we should be hopeful, not cynical or nasty; we should exude some realistic optimism that we can influence or mitigate evil and improve human affairs. We should strive to resolve our problems and overcome adversity. We should try to select courses of action in the light of both reason and good will.

Indeed, this positive attitude is a fundamental principle to which, I submit, we each need to be committed-even if, at times, we are defeated or suffer tragic reversals. By a good will, I mean that we should strive whenever we can to do good. Surely, this includes an obligation to assist those who are in need, including children, the infirm, the destitute-those who suffer and need help. But more than that, we should develop a generalized attitude of sympathy, benevolence, and affection toward others.

It’s not too difficult to imagine that, even if our ethical decision making were oriented toward producing the most good and least evil, we might not get very far without good will. If we tried, then our ethical decision making would become an impersonal process, devoid of any passionate engagement with the issues. Lacking such personal engagement, it would be very difficult to understand the experiences of others and thereby realize when our actions are ultimately producing good vs. evil.

Having a “good will,” though, means having a positive attitude towards life and towards others. It means wishing for the good and acting for the good just as a general principle, even when no particular ethical dilemmas are under scrutiny. This, in turn, should have positive results when we are faced with making ethical decisions. Just as we should develop a “habit of reasonableness” in which we apply skepticism and critical thinking as a matter of course, we should also develop a habit of “good will” in which we apply affirmative and positive attitudes as a matter of course.

Developing a good will is not, however, merely something that applies in our relationships with others — it’s also something that is important in how we deal with our own lives:

Good will not only applies to our relationships with others, but to ourselves. By this, I mean that each of us should try to develop a positive attitude toward his or her own life; we should hope for the best, not the worst. This means that we need to believe in our own powers, to have some confidence in our abilities to achieve some measure of what we want. Thus, each person should recognize that he or she has but one life to live and that he or she should strive mightily to make that life worth living. If we are to lead significant lives, we need to make moral choices and take responsibility for our actions....

We should avoid hedonophobia, that is, we should not fear to enjoy life or believe that we are not entitled to do so. We should likewise avoid destructive pessimism, the view that nothing will work out in the end. This is the refuge of bitter people, the haven of the sourpusses of the world. We need a friendly attitude, some wit and humor, laughter, and fun.

We should accept the fact that we are not perfect but still able to overcome our errors and misdeeds and move on to a new plateaus of experience. No doubt, we need to work hard if we are to attain our goals, but we also need to take time to smell the lilacs and perfume, to taste honey and nectar. Unlike some moralists, overwhelmed by their sense of duty, I affirm that the pursuit of happiness — exuberance — is morally justifiable and personally enriching.

There are many religious moralizers who deny that life is good (at least, outside of their religion) and should be valued for what it is. Given such a state, it’s hard to see how they can manage to do much good in the world around them — if you are going to start out with such a negative attitude, it will infuse all that you do. By the same token, though, starting out with a positive attitude towards life itself should infuse your actions in a positive way.

In many ways, life is what you make of it. If you approach it as something to be denigrated, something dirty, and something that has fallen from some pervious state of perfection, then you will never be very happy or satisfied with what life offers. At best you might find solace in the hope that some better will come along after this life. If, however, you approach life as something with many opportunities for learning and experiencing, then you have a chance at being happy. The key is to want to be happy and to want to enjoy life — to have a good will about life generally and your life in particular.

Read More:

Comments
stevedoetsch(1)

If we do not want to be ethical, but we are only ethical when we have to be, then when the law does not require it, we will not be ethical. The purpose of law is to stop those who would otherwise abuse their freedom and harm others. Freedom is choosing good when we could choose evil. Thus a people who’s government protects their freedom must be guided by values beyond civil authority in the use of that freedom:
“[W]e have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. . . . Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
John Adams, Second President of the United States
Source: http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/search/detail.php?ResourceID=21

June 1, 2006 at 1:21 pm
Reply

Freedom is choosing good when we could choose evil.

That’s a common excuse offered by tyrants for why they deny people the ability to choose things they don’t like: just claim that it’s not “true” freedom to choose the “wrong” things.

Also: “the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,” from the Treaty of Tripoli, signed by the same John Adams.

June 1, 2006 at 1:36 pm
Reply
mathyoo(3)

Freedom is choosing good when we could choose evil.

So who decides what is good and what is evil?

June 2, 2006 at 11:11 am
Reply
Tyciol(4)

What foolishness. Freedom is simply the potential to choose good and evil. It has nothing to do with what you do with it, otherwise it wouldn’t be free thought.

What defines good and evil, right and wrong, is each person, who can judge their own and others’ actions.

Religion, beyond it’s inherant stupidity and waste of time, cheapens good will and personal ethics by tricking people out of superstition into commiting them. Sometimes I’m motivated to allow it to exist for what it is, but I believe such religions have already done their job far past well enough in seeding altruism enough for us to recognize its benefits.

Now, atheism has Humanism, we don’t need it anymore. Let the religious people be free.

Inherant altruists will have more time to spend on the fruits of their labour and not paying priests to waste time. Heck, in some cases atheists go to church just to get in on the human helping. No more!

As for the people who wouldn’t care otherwise except for being brainwashed or who want to go to paradise, or who are fearing hellfire, be free! Be a jerk, serve yourself, heck, go out and start a bar fight. I’ll be there to deal with your kind, now that I can see you for what you are.

June 10, 2006 at 4:35 am
Reply
KIYENY FESTUS(5)

everything done good

March 2, 2009 at 8:26 am
Reply
Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.