Ann Coulter vs. Reality
Case in point is Ann "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity" Coulter, who writes about the legal challenges to Roy Moore's antics, including his early efforts to have Christian prayers in the courts:
Obviously you can't have prayer in court: It might distract all the people holding their hand over a Bible and swearing before God almighty to tell the truth.
That's Ann Coulter's fantasy. In reality, no one has to put a hand on a Bible and swear before God to tell the truth - if anyone doesn't want to do this, they can simply affirm that they will tell the truth. It's only people like Coulter who are upset over this, thinking that unless a person swears to their god, then they can't be trusted.
An affirmative action, Carter-appointed judge ... found that the Ten Commandments plaque violated the First Amendment. Apparently, in a little-noticed development, Judge Moore had become "Congress," his Ten Commandments plaque was a "law," and the plaque established a national religion.
It is only a part of Coulter's fantasy that constitutional limitations on the government's power only applies to acts of Congress and no one ele. In Ann Coulter's fantasy world, the police can't violate your Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure because a warrantless search isn't an act of Congress, government agents can't violate your First Amendment rights of free speech because those agents' actions aren't a law, and the ATF can't violate your Second Amendment rights to keep and bear arms because their seizure of your guns doesn't involve Congress.
Well, that's enough for this time - I don't want to embarrass Ann any further. Everyone has problems with reality and so it's only natural that, at times, fantasy will be preferable. But Ann's gone so far off the deep end that I hope she gets treatment soon.
Read More:


Comments
its really funny that no one commented…probably because no one agrees with you. Sorry, but thats just “reality”
Or no one disagrees.
Well, if you disagree, why don’t you offer a substantive to my arguments.